🔗 Share this article

As a DM, I usually avoided extensive use of chance during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be shaped by character actions instead of random chance. That said, I decided to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

An influential streamed game features a DM who regularly asks for "luck rolls" from the adventurers. This involves choosing a specific dice and defining consequences contingent on the roll. While it's at its core no different from using a pre-generated chart, these are created on the spot when a character's decision lacks a clear outcome.

I decided to try this approach at my own session, mostly because it appeared interesting and offered a break from my standard routine. The results were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing tension between pre-determination and randomization in a tabletop session.

A Powerful Story Beat

In a recent session, my players had survived a large-scale battle. Later, a cleric character inquired after two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. In place of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; on a 5-9, only one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This led to a profoundly poignant moment where the party found the corpses of their allies, still holding hands in their final moments. The cleric conducted last rites, which was especially powerful due to previous roleplaying. In a concluding touch, I decided that the forms were miraculously restored, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group lacked to resolve another major story problem. It's impossible to plan such serendipitous moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This experience caused me to question if randomization and making it up are actually the essence of D&D. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Players frequently excel at derailing the best constructed plots. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to think quickly and invent details on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these talents without venturing too far outside your preparation. The strategy is to deploy them for small-scale decisions that have a limited impact on the overarching story. For instance, I would not employ it to establish if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to decide if the PCs enter a room just in time to see a critical event unfolds.

Empowering Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also works to keep players engaged and create the impression that the game world is alive, shaping in reaction to their decisions as they play. It prevents the sense that they are merely characters in a DM's sole script, thereby enhancing the cooperative nature of the game.

This philosophy has long been embedded in the original design. The game's roots were reliant on encounter generators, which suited a game focused on dungeon crawling. Even though modern D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the only path.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

There is absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. But, it's also fine no problem with relinquishing control and permitting the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Authority is a significant part of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to manage the world, yet we often struggle to give some up, even when doing so could be beneficial.

The core suggestion is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Embrace a little chance for minor details. You might just find that the surprising result is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have scripted on your own.